Reconstructing Islamic Religious Education Test Instruments Through Authentic Digital Assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61166/classroom.v3i1.54Keywords:
Islamic Religious Education, Authentic Assessment, Written Test, Oral Test, Performance Test, Digital AssessmentAbstract
The advent of digital transformation and the emergence of generative artificial intelligence appear to have challenged conventional assessment practices within Islamic Religious Education, particularly concerning the treatment of written examinations as the primary evidential measure of students' religious comprehension. This article seeks to effect a reconstruction of assessment instruments in Islamic Religious Education through the integration of written, oral, and performance evaluations within an authentic assessment framework. This study utilizes a descriptive-analytical approach, grounded in a comprehensive examination of extant literature pertaining to educational evaluation, authentic assessment, Islamic Religious Education assessment, digital learning, and artificial intelligence in education. The findings suggest that while written tests may retain utility for assessing conceptual understanding, religious reasoning, and textual literacy, they appear insufficient for encompassing oral competence, worship practices, moral conduct, and the internalization of Islamic values. Oral tests are needed to verify the depth and authenticity of students' understanding, while performance tests are essential for assessing worship skills, religious behavior, and value-based action. This article proposes the development of an integrative assessment model, which is predicated upon the triangulation of written, oral, and performative evidence, substantially supported by digital technology. The model positions technology as a tool for documentation, feedback, and portfolio management, while teachers remain the central pedagogical interpreters of students' religious learning evidence.
References
Abdurrahman. (2024). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan dalam Pendidikan Islam. Adabuna: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran, 3(2), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.38073/adabuna.v3i2.1563
Adlini, M. N., Dinda, A. H., Yulinda, S., Chotimah, O., & Merliyana, S. J. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(1), 974–980. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v6i1.3394
Astuti, M., & Ismail, F. (2025). Reconstruction of Integrative Methods in Merdeka Curriculum for Islamic Education Subjects. Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education, 9(2), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v9i2.67
Badan Standar, K., dan Asesmen Pendidikan. (2025). Panduan Pembelajaran dan Asesmen Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah (Edisi revisi 2025). Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. https://kurikulum.kemendikdasmen.go.id/service/download.php?id=120&kategori=rujukan
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to Create and Use Rubrics for Formative Assessment and Grading. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119191681
Brookhart, S. M., & Nitko, A. J. (2019). Educational Assessment of Students (8th edition). Pearson. https://www.pearsonhighered.com/assets/preface/0/1/3/4/0134806972.pdf
Brufau Alvira, N., Bannister, P., & Santamaría Urbieta, A. (2025). Validating the PANDORA GENAI Susceptibility Rubric for Higher Education Assessment: A Field Test of All Translation and Interpreting BA Assignments. Higher Education Quarterly, 79(4), e70056. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70056
Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A Five-Dimensional Framework for Authentic Assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504676
Hidayah, S. N., Shofiyuddin, M., & Hasanah, U. (2025). Toward a Religious-Oriented Model of Speaking Assessment: Evidence from English Teachers in Islamic Secondary Schools. Evaluasi: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 379–397. https://doi.org/10.32478/0tyg8x34
Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002
Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. (2026). Capaian Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti Fase D. Guru Kemendikdasmen. https://guru.kemendikdasmen.go.id/kurikulum/referensi-penerapan/capaian-pembelajaran/sd-sma/pendidikan-agama-islam-dan-budi-pekerti/fase-d/
Koh, K., Lock, J., & DePass, C. (2023). CPI Special Issue: “All That Glitters is Not Gold: Culturally Responsive Online Assessment and Pedagogy in Uncertain Times.” Cultural and Pedagogical Inquiry, 15(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.18733/cpi29704
Kusnadi, D. (2018). Efektivitas Implementasi Kebijakan Penilaian Autentik pada Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. Ta’dibuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.32832/tadibuna.v7i1.1348
Magfirah, I., Afiyati, F., & Bashith, A. (2025). Transformasi Evaluasi Pembelajaran PAI berbasis Digital: Optimalisasi Media Quizizz sebagai Alat Ukur Adaptif. Al-Qalam: Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Pendidikan, 17(1), 435–444. https://doi.org/10.47435/al-qalam.v17i1.3949
Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran, Penilaian, dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Nuha Medika. https://perpus-bbgtkjateng.kemendikdasmen.go.id/index.php?id=1507&p=show_detail
Marfuah, A., & Febriza, F. (2019). Penilaian Autentik pada Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI) di Sekolah dan Perguruan Tinggi. FONDATIA, 3(2), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.36088/fondatia.v3i2.301
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Miao, F., & Cukurova, M. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers (Nos. 978-92-3-100707–1). UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/ZJTE2084
Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research (Nos. 978-92-3-100612–8). UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (ed. revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mukmin, M., & Nuraini, N. (2024). Integrasi Penilaian Tes dan Non-Tes dalam Pendidikan Agama Islam: Menuju Evaluasi Holistik untuk Pembelajaran Berkelanjutan. Journal of Instructional and Development Researches, 4(5), 370–379. https://doi.org/10.53621/jider.v4i5.384
Muhammad Yusuf Hilman, & Iskandar Yusuf. (2025). The Influence of Contextual Learning Strategies on Student Learning Outcomes on Moral Creed Material at Mts Al-Muttaqien Balikpapan. Responsive: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 1(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.61166/responsive.v1i1.5
O’Leary, M., Scully, D., Karakolidis, A., & Pitsia, V. (2018). The state-of-the-art in digital technology-based assessment. European Journal of Education, 53(2), 160–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12271
Perkins, M., Furze, L., Roe, J., & MacVaugh, J. (2024). The Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (AIAS): A Framework for Ethical Integration of Generative AI in Educational Assessment. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(6). https://doi.org/10.53761/q3azde36
Perkins, M., Roe, J., & Furze, L. (2025). Reimagining the Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale: A Refined Framework for Educational Assessment. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 22(7). https://doi.org/10.53761/rrm4y757
Rahmawati, A. R., Wulandari, R., Sadaruddin, M. A. S., Mustofa, T. A., & Chedimae, H. (2025). Optimization of Artificial Intelligence in Islamic Religious Education: Opportunities and Challenges in Learning Evaluation. Suhuf: International Journal of Islamic Studies, 37(2), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.23917/suhuf.v37i2.11015
Regita, R., Al-Husein, M. H., Alam, M. N., & Inayati, N. L. (2024). Penerapan Evaluasi Pembelajaran PAI dan Bahasa Arab dengan Tes Tertulis melalui Media Scola Digital Learning Manajemen System (LMS) di SMA Muhammadiyah Al-Kautsar PK Kartasura. ALSYS, 4(1), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.58578/alsys.v4i1.2471
Republik Indonesia. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 21 Tahun 2022 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/224425/permendikbudriset-no-21-tahun-2022
S, A. M., Asmiatin, A., Khoiri, K., Fattahuddin, M., & Halik, A. (2025). Construction of Theory and Concept of Digital-Based PAI Learning Assessment. Journal of Pedagogi, 2(2), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.62872/aqcdmh98
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Subehi, R., & Sriyanto, S. (2021). Implementasi Assessment Of, For, dan As Learning dalam Pembelajaran Daring PAI di SMPN 8 Purwokerto. Alhamra: Jurnal Studi Islam, 2(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.30595/ajsi.v2i2.10632
Uswatun Hasanah, & Nurlaela Rusdin. (2025). The Influence of The Application of The Discussion Method on The Learning Motivation of Intensive PAI Semester IV Students in PAI Learning Planning and Design Courses. Kasyafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 2(2), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.61166/kasyafa.v2i2.9
Widiyarto, A., & Inayati, N. L. (2023). Penerapan Evaluasi Pembelajaran Tes dan Non-Tes Pendidikan Agama Islam di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Munaddhomah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 4(2), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v4i2.439
Wiggins, G. (1990). The Case for Authentic Assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.7275/ffb1-mm19
Zed, M. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=zG9sDAAAQBAJ
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Reza Setya Rachman, Dina Hermina, Sheila Rosalia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







