Reconstructing Islamic Religious Education Test Instruments Through Authentic Digital Assessment

Authors

  • Reza Setya Rachman Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin, Indonesia
  • Dina Hermina Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin, Indonesia
  • Sheila Rosalia Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61166/classroom.v3i1.54

Keywords:

Islamic Religious Education, Authentic Assessment, Written Test, Oral Test, Performance Test, Digital Assessment

Abstract

The advent of digital transformation and the emergence of generative artificial intelligence appear to have challenged conventional assessment practices within Islamic Religious Education, particularly concerning the treatment of written examinations as the primary evidential measure of students' religious comprehension. This article seeks to effect a reconstruction of assessment instruments in Islamic Religious Education through the integration of written, oral, and performance evaluations within an authentic assessment framework. This study utilizes a descriptive-analytical approach, grounded in a comprehensive examination of extant literature pertaining to educational evaluation, authentic assessment, Islamic Religious Education assessment, digital learning, and artificial intelligence in education. The findings suggest that while written tests may retain utility for assessing conceptual understanding, religious reasoning, and textual literacy, they appear insufficient for encompassing oral competence, worship practices, moral conduct, and the internalization of Islamic values. Oral tests are needed to verify the depth and authenticity of students' understanding, while performance tests are essential for assessing worship skills, religious behavior, and value-based action. This article proposes the development of an integrative assessment model, which is predicated upon the triangulation of written, oral, and performative evidence, substantially supported by digital technology. The model positions technology as a tool for documentation, feedback, and portfolio management, while teachers remain the central pedagogical interpreters of students' religious learning evidence.

References

Abdurrahman. (2024). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan dalam Pendidikan Islam. Adabuna: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran, 3(2), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.38073/adabuna.v3i2.1563

Adlini, M. N., Dinda, A. H., Yulinda, S., Chotimah, O., & Merliyana, S. J. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(1), 974–980. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v6i1.3394

Astuti, M., & Ismail, F. (2025). Reconstruction of Integrative Methods in Merdeka Curriculum for Islamic Education Subjects. Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education, 9(2), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v9i2.67

Badan Standar, K., dan Asesmen Pendidikan. (2025). Panduan Pembelajaran dan Asesmen Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah (Edisi revisi 2025). Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. https://kurikulum.kemendikdasmen.go.id/service/download.php?id=120&kategori=rujukan

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to Create and Use Rubrics for Formative Assessment and Grading. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119191681

Brookhart, S. M., & Nitko, A. J. (2019). Educational Assessment of Students (8th edition). Pearson. https://www.pearsonhighered.com/assets/preface/0/1/3/4/0134806972.pdf

Brufau Alvira, N., Bannister, P., & Santamaría Urbieta, A. (2025). Validating the PANDORA GENAI Susceptibility Rubric for Higher Education Assessment: A Field Test of All Translation and Interpreting BA Assignments. Higher Education Quarterly, 79(4), e70056. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70056

Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A Five-Dimensional Framework for Authentic Assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504676

Hidayah, S. N., Shofiyuddin, M., & Hasanah, U. (2025). Toward a Religious-Oriented Model of Speaking Assessment: Evidence from English Teachers in Islamic Secondary Schools. Evaluasi: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 379–397. https://doi.org/10.32478/0tyg8x34

Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002

Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. (2026). Capaian Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti Fase D. Guru Kemendikdasmen. https://guru.kemendikdasmen.go.id/kurikulum/referensi-penerapan/capaian-pembelajaran/sd-sma/pendidikan-agama-islam-dan-budi-pekerti/fase-d/

Koh, K., Lock, J., & DePass, C. (2023). CPI Special Issue: “All That Glitters is Not Gold: Culturally Responsive Online Assessment and Pedagogy in Uncertain Times.” Cultural and Pedagogical Inquiry, 15(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.18733/cpi29704

Kusnadi, D. (2018). Efektivitas Implementasi Kebijakan Penilaian Autentik pada Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. Ta’dibuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.32832/tadibuna.v7i1.1348

Magfirah, I., Afiyati, F., & Bashith, A. (2025). Transformasi Evaluasi Pembelajaran PAI berbasis Digital: Optimalisasi Media Quizizz sebagai Alat Ukur Adaptif. Al-Qalam: Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Pendidikan, 17(1), 435–444. https://doi.org/10.47435/al-qalam.v17i1.3949

Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran, Penilaian, dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Nuha Medika. https://perpus-bbgtkjateng.kemendikdasmen.go.id/index.php?id=1507&p=show_detail

Marfuah, A., & Febriza, F. (2019). Penilaian Autentik pada Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI) di Sekolah dan Perguruan Tinggi. FONDATIA, 3(2), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.36088/fondatia.v3i2.301

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Miao, F., & Cukurova, M. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers (Nos. 978-92-3-100707–1). UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/ZJTE2084

Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research (Nos. 978-92-3-100612–8). UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (ed. revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mukmin, M., & Nuraini, N. (2024). Integrasi Penilaian Tes dan Non-Tes dalam Pendidikan Agama Islam: Menuju Evaluasi Holistik untuk Pembelajaran Berkelanjutan. Journal of Instructional and Development Researches, 4(5), 370–379. https://doi.org/10.53621/jider.v4i5.384

Muhammad Yusuf Hilman, & Iskandar Yusuf. (2025). The Influence of Contextual Learning Strategies on Student Learning Outcomes on Moral Creed Material at Mts Al-Muttaqien Balikpapan. Responsive: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 1(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.61166/responsive.v1i1.5

O’Leary, M., Scully, D., Karakolidis, A., & Pitsia, V. (2018). The state-of-the-art in digital technology-based assessment. European Journal of Education, 53(2), 160–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12271

Perkins, M., Furze, L., Roe, J., & MacVaugh, J. (2024). The Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (AIAS): A Framework for Ethical Integration of Generative AI in Educational Assessment. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(6). https://doi.org/10.53761/q3azde36

Perkins, M., Roe, J., & Furze, L. (2025). Reimagining the Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale: A Refined Framework for Educational Assessment. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 22(7). https://doi.org/10.53761/rrm4y757

Rahmawati, A. R., Wulandari, R., Sadaruddin, M. A. S., Mustofa, T. A., & Chedimae, H. (2025). Optimization of Artificial Intelligence in Islamic Religious Education: Opportunities and Challenges in Learning Evaluation. Suhuf: International Journal of Islamic Studies, 37(2), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.23917/suhuf.v37i2.11015

Regita, R., Al-Husein, M. H., Alam, M. N., & Inayati, N. L. (2024). Penerapan Evaluasi Pembelajaran PAI dan Bahasa Arab dengan Tes Tertulis melalui Media Scola Digital Learning Manajemen System (LMS) di SMA Muhammadiyah Al-Kautsar PK Kartasura. ALSYS, 4(1), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.58578/alsys.v4i1.2471

Republik Indonesia. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 21 Tahun 2022 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/224425/permendikbudriset-no-21-tahun-2022

S, A. M., Asmiatin, A., Khoiri, K., Fattahuddin, M., & Halik, A. (2025). Construction of Theory and Concept of Digital-Based PAI Learning Assessment. Journal of Pedagogi, 2(2), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.62872/aqcdmh98

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Subehi, R., & Sriyanto, S. (2021). Implementasi Assessment Of, For, dan As Learning dalam Pembelajaran Daring PAI di SMPN 8 Purwokerto. Alhamra: Jurnal Studi Islam, 2(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.30595/ajsi.v2i2.10632

Uswatun Hasanah, & Nurlaela Rusdin. (2025). The Influence of The Application of The Discussion Method on The Learning Motivation of Intensive PAI Semester IV Students in PAI Learning Planning and Design Courses. Kasyafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 2(2), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.61166/kasyafa.v2i2.9

Widiyarto, A., & Inayati, N. L. (2023). Penerapan Evaluasi Pembelajaran Tes dan Non-Tes Pendidikan Agama Islam di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Munaddhomah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 4(2), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v4i2.439

Wiggins, G. (1990). The Case for Authentic Assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.7275/ffb1-mm19

Zed, M. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=zG9sDAAAQBAJ

Downloads

Published

2026-06-14

How to Cite

Reza Setya Rachman, Dina Hermina, & Sheila Rosalia. (2026). Reconstructing Islamic Religious Education Test Instruments Through Authentic Digital Assessment. Classroom: Journal of Islamic Education, 3(1), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.61166/classroom.v3i1.54

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.